03-26-2015, 08:53 PM
Hi.
I have been using experimenting with the swarm merge feature.
I downloaded a torrent consisting of mainly a video and a few auxiliary files. It stopped at 97%
Then I found another torrent which had some additional files (screen caps) but also the same 1.5Gb video.
2. torrent slowly grew due to swarm merge, (my download PC is very slow) but none the less it grew somewhat faster than it downloaded :-)
When second torrent then completed, (after DL the remaining 3%) the first torrent kept being stuck. I would have expected it to merge backwards from the torrent now seeding.
I then deleted some of the small aux files in torrent 2. (screen caps), and then set then to DL again on low priority, and capping the DL speed to 2 Kb/s.
This made the video merge back to torrent 1 whereupon it became complete, and started seeding. :-)
I now have more or less same situation with 3 torrents on 1.56 Gb
Torrent 1 is completed with a swam merge of 50Mb, torrent 2 is stuck at 95,7% with a merge of 1.58Gb(!), torrent 3 is stuck at 95.1% with a 1.43Gb merge.
I can't do the "delete some files" trick here as torrent 1 is only one file.
I really like this new Swarm Merge feature.
If the corner case I'm trying to describe above is real, and not only because of my low power system, I would love to see that fixed.
That would enable me to be the nice guy seeding otherwise dead torrents :-)
Best regards...
I have been using experimenting with the swarm merge feature.
I downloaded a torrent consisting of mainly a video and a few auxiliary files. It stopped at 97%
Then I found another torrent which had some additional files (screen caps) but also the same 1.5Gb video.
2. torrent slowly grew due to swarm merge, (my download PC is very slow) but none the less it grew somewhat faster than it downloaded :-)
When second torrent then completed, (after DL the remaining 3%) the first torrent kept being stuck. I would have expected it to merge backwards from the torrent now seeding.
I then deleted some of the small aux files in torrent 2. (screen caps), and then set then to DL again on low priority, and capping the DL speed to 2 Kb/s.
This made the video merge back to torrent 1 whereupon it became complete, and started seeding. :-)
I now have more or less same situation with 3 torrents on 1.56 Gb
Torrent 1 is completed with a swam merge of 50Mb, torrent 2 is stuck at 95,7% with a merge of 1.58Gb(!), torrent 3 is stuck at 95.1% with a 1.43Gb merge.
I can't do the "delete some files" trick here as torrent 1 is only one file.
I really like this new Swarm Merge feature.
If the corner case I'm trying to describe above is real, and not only because of my low power system, I would love to see that fixed.
That would enable me to be the nice guy seeding otherwise dead torrents :-)
Best regards...