Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BUG: Options->Connection: UDP/TCP Port
#1
The content of the about box:
Java 1.8.0_20
 Oracle Corporation
SWT v4403, gtk
Linux v3.13.0-36-generic, amd64
V5.4.0.0/4 az3

Hi, i edited the UDP/TCP port (Options->Connection) and the values are evaluated during typing and not after using the save button.

So, if i like to type 50000, after typing the 5 vuze trys to make listeners at port 5 and gets an exception:
[alert] Alert:3:ERROR, unable to bind TCP incoming server socket to 5
DEBUG::Sun Sep 28 22:51:56 CEST 2014::com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.VirtualBlockingServerChannelSelector::start::94:
  java.net.SocketException: Permission denied
    at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method)
    at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:436)
    at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:428)
    at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:214)
    at sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.VirtualBlockingServerChannelSelector.start(VirtualBlockingServerChannelSelector.java:80)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.IncomingSocketChannelManager.start(IncomingSocketChannelManager.java:423)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.IncomingSocketChannelManager.restart(IncomingSocketChannelManager.java:499)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.IncomingSocketChannelManager.access$200(IncomingSocketChannelManager.java:66)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.core.networkmanager.impl.tcp.IncomingSocketChannelManager$1.parameterChanged(IncomingSocketChannelManager.java:108)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.core3.config.impl.ConfigurationManager.notifyParameterListeners(ConfigurationManager.java:1071)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.core3.config.impl.ConfigurationManager.notifyParameterListenersIfChanged(ConfigurationManager.java:786)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.core3.config.impl.ConfigurationManager.setParameter(ConfigurationManager.java:574)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.core3.config.COConfigurationManager.setParameter(COConfigurationManager.java:349)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.config.ConfigParameterAdapter.setIntValue(ConfigParameterAdapter.java:105)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.config.generic.GenericIntParameter$1$1.runSupport(GenericIntParameter.java:96)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.core3.util.AERunnable.run(AERunnable.java:38)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:135)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3715)
    at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3364)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.<init>;(SWTThread.java:297)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.createInstance(SWTThread.java:64)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.ui.swt.Initializer.<init>;(Initializer.java:160)
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:408)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.<init>;(Main.java:114)
    at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main(Main.java:331)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:483)
    at com.aelitis.azureus.launcher.MainExecutor$1.run(MainExecutor.java:37)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


So, the change should only be made, after pressing the save button.




 

 
Reply
#2
I agree it isn't great - however overall the connection between the 'save' button and the persistence of changes is largely broken (there's no 'Cancel' button for good reason...) I messed around with it a bit but couldn't find a qu
Reply
#3
(09-29-2014, 09:30 AM)'parg' Wrote: I agree it isn't great - however overall the connection between the 'save' button and the persistence of changes is largely broken (there's no 'Cancel' button for good reason...) I messed around with it a bit but couldn't find a qu

 


I see. I changed some things and the result was stored directly.

The save button should be removed, it is useless. This will make a lot of confusion ;-)


 
Reply
#4
The 'save' button isn't entirely useless, although closing the options panel does an automatic-save.

There are two ways parts of Vuze listen for configuration changes - one is explicitly via parameter (the usual case) and the other at the overall save-event level. It would be possible to switch the port logic from per-parameter (with the added complexity that the spinner widget used for the port setting is generating intermediate events) to per-save, but  I'm not sure this is ideal either. I tried to prevent the intermediate event generation for the widget (and move to something like focus-lost) but this didn't work out well.
Reply
#5
(09-29-2014, 11:31 AM)'parg' Wrote: The 'save' button isn't entirely useless, although closing the options panel does an automatic-save.

There are two ways parts of Vuze listen for configuration changes - one is explicitly via parameter (the usual case) and the other at the overall save-event level. It would be possible to switch the port logic from per-parameter (with the added complexity that the spinner widget used for the port setting is generating intermediate events) to per-save, but  I'm not sure this is ideal either. I tried to prevent the intermediate event generation for the widget (and move to something like focus-lost) but this didn't work out well.


 


Ok, forget it, i thought it would be easy. I was irritated, because vuze "hangs" between typing the digits. For me it works, so don't do anything more about it. Thank you!
 

 
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vuze sends port=0 to trackers when both IPv4 and IPv6 tracker/announce exists supercoolman 0 3,647 04-02-2018, 05:06 PM
Last Post: supercoolman
  Torrents will not stop on command bug neinome 2 5,311 10-22-2017, 06:25 AM
Last Post: Havokdan



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)