Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Checking v. Seeding & Checking
#1
When a torrent finishes, it moves to the completed section and goes through a checking phase with the status of "Seeding & Checking".  

What I have seen is that the "checking" in this scenario takes FAR LONGER than if you decide to just perform a "checking".  Note that I have seen this speed difference ALWAYS and NOT ALWAYS is there any seeding going on.  (If there was seeding and a high bandwidth I would agree that the system is doing two things and thus it would take longer to do perform both simulateously; but in many cases I may d/l from a single seeder and no one else is d/l so it shows "seeding & checking" with zero upload bandwidth).

I am looking for a material difference in both processes.  I believe firmly it is safe to STOP and RE-CHECK and if it rechecks with 100% status, all is fine.  But there must be a reason why the two scenarios are wildly different in performance.

Thanks
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  cross seeding? jriker1 0 93 12-22-2016, 06:20 PM
Last Post: jriker1
  Automatically remove torrents from library after reaching seeding ratio? monkeybarn 4 389 11-05-2016, 07:40 AM
Last Post: Flinxxx



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)